Which of the following statements about Terry v. Ohio is true?

The statement that the case established the standard for reasonable suspicion for stops and frisks is true because, in Terry v. Ohio, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that a law enforcement officer can stop and briefly detain a person based on reasonable suspicion of criminal activity, even if the officer does not have a warrant or probable cause to arrest. This case set a legal precedent that allows police officers to conduct a limited pat-down of a person's outer clothing for weapons if they have a reasonable suspicion that the person is armed and poses a threat to safety. The ruling is significant in defining the balance between individual rights and public safety, allowing for proactive policing without the need for a warrant in situations where there is a safety concern.